<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: New F1 Medal System Withdrawn and a Solution</title> <atom:link href="http://www.f1hamilton.net/new-f1-medal-system-withdrawn-and-solution.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.f1hamilton.net/new-f1-medal-system-withdrawn-and-solution.html</link> <description>F1 Hamilton.net</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 02:10:15 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator> <item><title>By: F1Hamilton.net</title><link>http://www.f1hamilton.net/new-f1-medal-system-withdrawn-and-solution.html#comment-160</link> <dc:creator>F1Hamilton.net</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:03:26 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1hamilton.net/?p=284#comment-160</guid> <description>Hi Keith, you&#039;re right about the percentages - it was getting late when I wrote this.15-10-8-6-4-3-2-1 sounds like a really good idea - lets hope F1 is listening as simple solutions are much more effective and it&#039;ll also be much easier for people to understand.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Keith, you&#8217;re right about the percentages &#8211; it was getting late when I wrote this.</p><p>15-10-8-6-4-3-2-1 sounds like a really good idea &#8211; lets hope F1 is listening as simple solutions are much more effective and it&#8217;ll also be much easier for people to understand.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Keith Collantine</title><link>http://www.f1hamilton.net/new-f1-medal-system-withdrawn-and-solution.html#comment-157</link> <dc:creator>Keith Collantine</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 23:22:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.f1hamilton.net/?p=284#comment-157</guid> <description>&quot;This system rewards the winner by having a bigger margin of points&quot;Under the Moto GP system second place is worth 80% of what a win is worth, which is exactly the same as under the present F1 system (10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1). And third place is even more valuable (64% vs 60%).Therefore the Moto GP system would actually value winning even less than the present arrangement in F1 and increase the important of consistency even more.I agree with you that what needs to be done is increase the value of winning while maintaining some reward for consistency. I would change the points system something more like this:15-10-8-6-4-3-2-1Where second place is worth 66% of a win.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This system rewards the winner by having a bigger margin of points&#8221;</p><p>Under the Moto GP system second place is worth 80% of what a win is worth, which is exactly the same as under the present F1 system (10-8-6-5-4-3-2-1). And third place is even more valuable (64% vs 60%).</p><p>Therefore the Moto GP system would actually value winning even less than the present arrangement in F1 and increase the important of consistency even more.</p><p>I agree with you that what needs to be done is increase the value of winning while maintaining some reward for consistency. I would change the points system something more like this:</p><p>15-10-8-6-4-3-2-1</p><p>Where second place is worth 66% of a win.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 3/14 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk

Served from: www.f1hamilton.net @ 2010-09-10 13:49:53 -->